Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33291 - 33300 of 58285 for speedy trial.

Village of Plover v. Scott K. Pittman
)(a). Pittman contends that the trial court erred by excluding testimony related to his reasons for refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3828 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with concealing the daughter from Larry during that time period. ¶3 During trial, the State elicited testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65479 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Hogenson argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the case was tried to the court. After post-trial briefing, the court issued a written decision awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173773 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at sentencing, and Stibbe’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object. The postconviction court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12

[PDF] State v. Jason E. Fladhammer
at trial that their initial plan was to go to a cemetery next to the church to “feel spooky
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
was obligated to address possible appellate issues arising pretrial, at trial and at sentencing, and state why
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109865 - 2014-04-08

[PDF] State v. Steven J. Reinhardt
did not receive effective assistance from his counsel. Reinhardt claimed that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2978 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Donald Jensen v. A Complete Spa & Pool Supply Centre, Inc.
the return of the $500. A Complete Spa entered a counterclaim for the $500. ¶3 At trial, Griswold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15844 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John A. Zulliger v. Town of Harding
on sovereign immunity grounds because the Zulligers did not appeal the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2482 - 2017-09-19