Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 69356 for as he.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 69356 for as he.
State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
recklessly endangering safety, and from the order denying postconviction relief.[1] He contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14205 - 2005-03-31
recklessly endangering safety, and from the order denying postconviction relief.[1] He contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, J.W.J., is an adult suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. He is currently subject
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191394 - 2017-09-21
, J.W.J., is an adult suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. He is currently subject
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191394 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. Rice
motion to correct his sentence for his conviction on one of the counts of burglary. He submits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6423 - 2017-09-19
motion to correct his sentence for his conviction on one of the counts of burglary. He submits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6423 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael O. Thomas
. § 947.01, and from the trial court’s order dying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
. § 947.01, and from the trial court’s order dying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey D. Berlin v. Lori S. Berlin
that Jeffrey did not establish he was entitled to have the support payments reduced. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4627 - 2017-09-19
that Jeffrey did not establish he was entitled to have the support payments reduced. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4627 - 2017-09-19
State v. David J. Arnold
to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J. Arnold
was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3862 - 2017-09-20
was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3862 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
Grunwald may have had for damage caused by fire. Second, he submits that the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28754 - 2014-09-15
Grunwald may have had for damage caused by fire. Second, he submits that the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick E. Fritz
midnight, Scanlon was patrolling in a marked squad car when he saw a car legally parked next to the curb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3040 - 2017-09-19
midnight, Scanlon was patrolling in a marked squad car when he saw a car legally parked next to the curb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3040 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, asserting that he had not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
, asserting that he had not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26