Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 29810 for des.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 29810 for des.
Jon Wirth v. City of Port Washington
determine that the errors that comprise this tiny fraction of the total incorporation are de minimis and do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3671 - 2005-03-31
determine that the errors that comprise this tiny fraction of the total incorporation are de minimis and do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3671 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System v. City of Milwaukee
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14067 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14067 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl R. Kramer
). However, we review de novo whether the trial court applied the correct legal standard to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
). However, we review de novo whether the trial court applied the correct legal standard to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 111
judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52646 - 2010-08-24
judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52646 - 2010-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. To be sufficient, a postconviction motion must allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34518 - 2008-11-11
is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. To be sufficient, a postconviction motion must allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34518 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
WI AP 121
at 533. Whether a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law we review de novo. Mahoney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87626 - 2014-09-15
at 533. Whether a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law we review de novo. Mahoney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87626 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97758 - 2013-06-03
a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97758 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15
for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
determination this court reviews de novo.” State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30929 - 2014-09-15
determination this court reviews de novo.” State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30929 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Z. P.
County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4425 - 2017-09-19
County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4425 - 2017-09-19