Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 10291 for ed.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 10291 for ed.
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
earlier that day. Riddiough made contact with Leonard and “at that time smell[ed] strongly the odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
earlier that day. Riddiough made contact with Leonard and “at that time smell[ed] strongly the odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony L.K.
, an associate principal at WFB. Ed Davis, [Anthony K.'s] special education teacher, was asked to come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11443 - 2005-03-31
, an associate principal at WFB. Ed Davis, [Anthony K.'s] special education teacher, was asked to come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11443 - 2005-03-31
Certification
), at 132-33 (4th ed. 2004). While this result was explicitly countenanced by the Supreme Court in Whren
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29909 - 2007-08-07
), at 132-33 (4th ed. 2004). While this result was explicitly countenanced by the Supreme Court in Whren
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29909 - 2007-08-07
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
was in possession of the documents he requested,” he could have “simply ask[ed] the trial court for a short recess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
was in possession of the documents he requested,” he could have “simply ask[ed] the trial court for a short recess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Dictionary 873 (3d ed. 1993)). “‘Excusable neglect is that neglect which might have been the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
Dictionary 873 (3d ed. 1993)). “‘Excusable neglect is that neglect which might have been the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
[,] sometimes back and forth.” See Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 460 (unabr. ed. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[,] sometimes back and forth.” See Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 460 (unabr. ed. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
by the prosecution and remand[ed] the matter to this Court for resentencing. I do find that under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
by the prosecution and remand[ed] the matter to this Court for resentencing. I do find that under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the possessor claim[ed] the land as his own.” Pierz v. Gorski, 88 Wis. 2d 131, 137, 276 N.W.2d 352 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64160 - 2011-05-17
that the possessor claim[ed] the land as his own.” Pierz v. Gorski, 88 Wis. 2d 131, 137, 276 N.W.2d 352 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64160 - 2011-05-17
State v. Heather C.P.
with that of tolling. See Blacks Law Dictionary 321, 583 and 1488 (6th ed. 1990). Moreover, because both M.G. and J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
with that of tolling. See Blacks Law Dictionary 321, 583 and 1488 (6th ed. 1990). Moreover, because both M.G. and J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, as happened here. In denying the postconviction motion, the circuit court “adopt[ed] the State’s proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
, as happened here. In denying the postconviction motion, the circuit court “adopt[ed] the State’s proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24