Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 49879 for our.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 49879 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and as modified affirmed; order, subject to our modification of the judgment, affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46400 - 2010-01-25
and as modified affirmed; order, subject to our modification of the judgment, affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46400 - 2010-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136289 - 2017-09-21
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to third-degree sexual assault, as a repeater.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95065 - 2014-09-15
to third-degree sexual assault, as a repeater.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the Record and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970084 - 2025-06-18
N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the Record and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970084 - 2025-06-18
CA Blank Order
. 2d 246, 274, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Wilson has not filed a response challenging that assessment. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102359 - 2013-09-23
. 2d 246, 274, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Wilson has not filed a response challenging that assessment. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102359 - 2013-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
any reason that the victim would have fabricated these allegations entirely. As a result, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140286 - 2015-04-22
any reason that the victim would have fabricated these allegations entirely. As a result, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140286 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. With respect to the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109121 - 2017-09-21
at sentencing. With respect to the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109121 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Ismert had regained competency to proceed in August 2014. See WIS. STAT. § 971.13(1). On our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159567 - 2017-09-21
that Ismert had regained competency to proceed in August 2014. See WIS. STAT. § 971.13(1). On our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159567 - 2017-09-21