Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 58445 for speedy trial.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 58445 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking a new trial based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Woldmoe contends his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01
motion seeking a new trial based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Woldmoe contends his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Michael B. Brennan presided over the trial and sentencing. The Honorable Timothy G. Dugan presided over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28362 - 2014-09-15
Michael B. Brennan presided over the trial and sentencing. The Honorable Timothy G. Dugan presided over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28362 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
) was dismissed and read-in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court sentenced Kinard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33100 - 2008-06-24
) was dismissed and read-in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court sentenced Kinard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33100 - 2008-06-24
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8138 - 2005-03-31
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that his plea was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, that trial counsel was ineffective in advising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
that his plea was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, that trial counsel was ineffective in advising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the trial court violated his right to a fair trial by refusing to accept his guilty pleas to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173787 - 2017-09-21
argues the trial court violated his right to a fair trial by refusing to accept his guilty pleas to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173787 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leamon Hoover
of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, see WIS. STAT. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21
of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, see WIS. STAT. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence E. Green
the trial court erroneously No. 2004AP1303-CR 2 exercised its sentencing discretion by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21566 - 2017-09-21
the trial court erroneously No. 2004AP1303-CR 2 exercised its sentencing discretion by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Beloit v. Thomas Goodwin
99-1356 2 originally contended that he was entitled to a de novo circuit court trial following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15555 - 2017-09-21
99-1356 2 originally contended that he was entitled to a de novo circuit court trial following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15555 - 2017-09-21