Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
Gwen Ann Franzen v. Richard Leroy Franzen
. (Rick & Vic’s). Richard argues that the trial court’s valuation of Rick & Vic’s was contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5154 - 2005-03-31
. (Rick & Vic’s). Richard argues that the trial court’s valuation of Rick & Vic’s was contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5154 - 2005-03-31
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Heuer
he inquired whether the sentence being imposed by the trial court was consecutive. Heuer also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20
he inquired whether the sentence being imposed by the trial court was consecutive. Heuer also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
that because the trial court lacked authority to vacate the revocation, the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14961 - 2017-09-21
that because the trial court lacked authority to vacate the revocation, the court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14961 - 2017-09-21
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
the annulment of his marriage to Mary Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leamon Hoover
of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, see WIS. STAT. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21
of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, see WIS. STAT. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21
Kim R. Smith v. Barbara J. Eastridge
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kim Smith appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kim Smith appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antoine D. Edwards
, as a party to a crime. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.02(1), 939.63, 939.05. Edwards claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13
, as a party to a crime. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.02(1), 939.63, 939.05. Edwards claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. Howlett argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial counsel was ineffective and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96736 - 2013-05-13
. Howlett argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial counsel was ineffective and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96736 - 2013-05-13