Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3331 - 3340 of 19379 for transfer by affidavit.

State v. Rayshun D. Eason
the circuit court and the court of appeals concluded that the affidavit submitted in support of the search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Denise Scheberle v. Bertram Milson, M.D.
that the Scheberles have tried to confuse the issue with a sham affidavit. We reject Milson’s argument and, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5633 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on a federal charge he was facing. In support, Starks filed a 2019 affidavit from Deante Chambers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12

State v. Brian Anderson
to the possession, use or distribution of cocaine. The affidavit upon which the search warrant was based set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7806 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brian Anderson
. The affidavit upon which the search warrant was based set forth information provided to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7806 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
to represent the child.2 The case was then transferred to Washington County for consolidation with an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
gratuitous transfers between family members. See Lucas, 281 U.S. at 114-15 (where husband attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2226 - 2017-09-19

The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
B&W attempted to assign anticipated income, nor did they attempt to effect gratuitous transfers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2226 - 2005-03-31

Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
to represent the child.[2] The case was then transferred to Washington County for consolidation with an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31

August F. Klitzka v. Michael J. Sullivan
and Sullivan moved for summary judgment. Sullivan’s motion, seeking dismissal, was supported by an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11323 - 2005-03-31