Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33301 - 33310 of 62662 for child support.
Search results 33301 - 33310 of 62662 for child support.
Alan Derzon v. Appleton Papers, Inc.
for summary judgment and supporting papers set out a prima facie defense – “that [Derzon] is unable to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2769 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment and supporting papers set out a prima facie defense – “that [Derzon] is unable to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2769 - 2005-03-31
State v. Francis E. Altman
the State’s case,” the State’s own evidence at trial was sufficient to support Altman’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
the State’s case,” the State’s own evidence at trial was sufficient to support Altman’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
brake lights are. This was the reason for the stop. These findings of fact are supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145690 - 2015-08-03
brake lights are. This was the reason for the stop. These findings of fact are supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145690 - 2015-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to terminate maintenance. In his affidavit in support of the motion, Jan noted that he was able to secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448261 - 2021-11-02
to terminate maintenance. In his affidavit in support of the motion, Jan noted that he was able to secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448261 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
State v. Ronald R. Yakes
court has not expressly made a finding necessary to support its legal conclusion, this court can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12693 - 2017-09-21
court has not expressly made a finding necessary to support its legal conclusion, this court can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12693 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. An investigatory stop, which Robertson argues is at issue here, must be supported by reasonable suspicion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195870 - 2017-09-21
. An investigatory stop, which Robertson argues is at issue here, must be supported by reasonable suspicion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195870 - 2017-09-21
State v. Graham Greene
, current income and expenses, education, employment history and the cost of supporting any other dependents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12034 - 2005-03-31
, current income and expenses, education, employment history and the cost of supporting any other dependents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12034 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, unguided by references and citations to specific testimony, to look for evidence to support the Hofackers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53590 - 2010-08-23
, unguided by references and citations to specific testimony, to look for evidence to support the Hofackers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53590 - 2010-08-23
Roxana Derus v. Garlock, Inc.
conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7857 - 2005-05-08
conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7857 - 2005-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support revocation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. ¶2 The Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30
was insufficient to support revocation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. ¶2 The Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30