Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33311 - 33320 of 59284 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 33311 - 33320 of 59284 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
performance is required for the trial court’s consideration of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12
performance is required for the trial court’s consideration of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a misstatement by the prosecution regarding self- defense, O’Keefe’s affirmative defense. O’Keefe also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72225 - 2014-09-15
a misstatement by the prosecution regarding self- defense, O’Keefe’s affirmative defense. O’Keefe also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of finality in his original Oneida County sentence as a double jeopardy claim. The State then argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372747 - 2021-06-02
of finality in his original Oneida County sentence as a double jeopardy claim. The State then argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372747 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not an option[.]” The court also rejected Brehm’s claim that the statute was overbroad, stating that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29
was not an option[.]” The court also rejected Brehm’s claim that the statute was overbroad, stating that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
life. See § 48.415(6). There would be no arguable merit to an appellate claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171040 - 2017-09-21
life. See § 48.415(6). There would be no arguable merit to an appellate claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171040 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
TPR petitions against the father, claiming continuing CHIPS pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2).3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252609 - 2020-01-23
TPR petitions against the father, claiming continuing CHIPS pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2).3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252609 - 2020-01-23
Joan I. Schwarz v. Dane County
that his children were in need of protection or services (CHIPS). She claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14547 - 2005-03-31
that his children were in need of protection or services (CHIPS). She claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14547 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the calculation of interest on Kennedy’s claims. On appeal, Kennedy does not directly address the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35196 - 2009-01-12
to the calculation of interest on Kennedy’s claims. On appeal, Kennedy does not directly address the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35196 - 2009-01-12
State v. Harris D. Byers
. It claims that a district attorney has authority to file a petition in instances where the DOJ has not filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
. It claims that a district attorney has authority to file a petition in instances where the DOJ has not filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31