Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33311 - 33320 of 45865 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 33311 - 33320 of 45865 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Ronald Waites
in evidence unless pretrial notice was given to permit the opponent to test the lawfulness of the interception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31
in evidence unless pretrial notice was given to permit the opponent to test the lawfulness of the interception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31
William Olson v. Sidney Kaprelian
the settlement never conducted a hearing to test whether the restitution order was validly “set off.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9560 - 2005-03-31
the settlement never conducted a hearing to test whether the restitution order was validly “set off.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9560 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the interest of justice test should not have been applied here in the first place, suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
contends that the interest of justice test should not have been applied here in the first place, suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
performance. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The “test for prejudice in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
performance. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The “test for prejudice in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
State v. Clifton M. Wright
). The defendant bears the burden of persuasion for both prongs of this test. Id. In reviewing the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
). The defendant bears the burden of persuasion for both prongs of this test. Id. In reviewing the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Jackson
at a verdict by considering factors other than the evidence. The constitutional test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18286 - 2017-09-21
at a verdict by considering factors other than the evidence. The constitutional test is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186250 - 2017-09-21
frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186250 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
] The material Beecraft gave the deputy, together with the baggie it was in, weighed 4.32 grams. Testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27
] The material Beecraft gave the deputy, together with the baggie it was in, weighed 4.32 grams. Testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27
State v. David J. Arnold
or her in custody. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 210. The test is whether a reasonable person in Arnold’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
or her in custody. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 210. The test is whether a reasonable person in Arnold’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ying N.V.
ruling. Id. at 282-83. The test for sufficiency is whether the complaint, or in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5722 - 2005-03-31
ruling. Id. at 282-83. The test for sufficiency is whether the complaint, or in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5722 - 2005-03-31