Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33321 - 33330 of 63277 for records.
Search results 33321 - 33330 of 63277 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. RULE 809.19, citing generally to “Record Index No. 140,” which is the multi-page affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97894 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. RULE 809.19, citing generally to “Record Index No. 140,” which is the multi-page affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97894 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. [3] The only record citation Portmann provides with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145111 - 2015-07-27
are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. [3] The only record citation Portmann provides with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145111 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
to do so.” We have reviewed the record; it confirms Johnson’s position. The State, citing State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21
to do so.” We have reviewed the record; it confirms Johnson’s position. The State, citing State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The only record citation Portmann provides with respect to this argument is to a transcript of a January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145111 - 2017-09-21
The only record citation Portmann provides with respect to this argument is to a transcript of a January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 973.155 (2019-20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13
. STAT. § 973.155 (2019-20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 704.27). Further, the record does not support the court’s reconsideration determination that Hanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21
§ 704.27). Further, the record does not support the court’s reconsideration determination that Hanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronan T. Heaney
a “third version” of the facts not found in the record in order to support its conclusion that Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6168 - 2005-03-31
a “third version” of the facts not found in the record in order to support its conclusion that Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and there isn’t anything on this record that I can see or know that would tell me that that radar gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184846 - 2017-09-21
; and there isn’t anything on this record that I can see or know that would tell me that that radar gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184846 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record and the facts presented at the hearing. Thus, Bryant-Nanz was not ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
on the record and the facts presented at the hearing. Thus, Bryant-Nanz was not ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21