Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 64709 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 64709 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Dykes G. Jupp
is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on newly discovered evidence. The record does not contain any motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5004 - 2017-09-19
is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on newly discovered evidence. The record does not contain any motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5004 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no relevant evidence of the shooting or no additional recordings that had visible images of the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894664 - 2024-12-26
no relevant evidence of the shooting or no additional recordings that had visible images of the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894664 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L.R.
and whether it applied the correct standard to the facts in the record. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10441 - 2017-09-20
and whether it applied the correct standard to the facts in the record. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10441 - 2017-09-20
State v. Wang Meng Yang
will affirm the trial court's decision if the record shows that the court considered the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7996 - 2005-03-31
will affirm the trial court's decision if the record shows that the court considered the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7996 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. STAT. § 343.301 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
. STAT. § 343.301 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the records, we conclude at conference No. 2024AP1718-CR 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13
and the records, we conclude at conference No. 2024AP1718-CR 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the records, we conclude at conference No. 2024AP1718-CR 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13
and the records, we conclude at conference No. 2024AP1718-CR 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060005 - 2026-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v. Odom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v. Odom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118128 - 2014-09-15
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 The record reflects that a video of Driggers’ statements to police was played at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21
1 The record reflects that a video of Driggers’ statements to police was played at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142619 - 2017-09-21