Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 38217 for ph d.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Orozco-Angulo points to that portion of § 968.12(3)(d) that says “the judge shall place under oath each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138978 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
or that the Department breached any plea agreement that the parties may have had.[7] D. Factual Basis For The Pleas ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30745 - 2007-10-31

Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
challenge. D. Glendale Tax Assessment. Finally, we address GHC’s challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13967 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: PATRICIA D. McMAHON and KEVIN E. MARTENS, Judges. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88749 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he “totally agree[d]” that the encounter should have no impact on his verdict, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601012 - 2022-12-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. D. Trial Counsel’s Strategy. ¶23 Finally, Carson contends that trial counsel failed to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101921 - 2017-09-21

Jennifer L. Weston v. Matthew J. B.
been the victim of abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f), including injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20999 - 2006-01-18

Diane Meyer v. School District of Colby
as to private property owners. See § 895.52(1)(a) and (d). The statute broadly defines “recreational activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13650 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sam Elam
to the level of plain error, we will not address this issue further. D. We will not exercise our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21

State v. Danuele M. Johnson
, a seizure occurs at the point when the subject yields to the show of authority. See California v. Hodari D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31