Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Adam V. Tovsen
testimony, the trial court denied Tovsen’s motion to suppress the results of the blood alcohol tests taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7077 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197874 - 2017-10-17

State v. Norbert J. Maday
. At trial the second victim testified about an incident that occurred in the spring of 1986, before his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8774 - 2009-08-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of first-degree reckless homicide as a party to a crime
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650730 - 2023-05-02

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted case 2015AP2356
. Raymond L. Nieves Did the admission of a co-defendant’s nontestimonial statement at a joint trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193070 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. Raymond L. Nieves Did the admission of a co-defendant’s nontestimonial statement at a joint trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192775 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. Raymond L. Nieves Did the admission of a co-defendant’s nontestimonial statement at a joint trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191979 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
after the start of trial, the circuit court dismissed all parties adverse to K&W, thereby ending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81188 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Adrian Lomax v. Patrick Fiedler
pass constitutional muster. We therefore affirm the trial court's judgment dismissing Lomax's action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9551 - 2017-09-19

Adrian Lomax v. Patrick Fiedler
U.S. at 89), and thus pass constitutional muster. We therefore affirm the trial court's judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9551 - 2005-03-31