Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 58500 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
within ten days, as required by WIS. STAT. § 301.45(4)(a). Newling was convicted after a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203728 - 2017-11-28

[PDF] NOTICE
his motion for postconviction relief. Snyder argues the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Columbus v. Donald L. Johnson
The trial court concluded that the circumstances observed by and known to the officer were sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7225 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
an injunction under § 813.12(4), STATS., should be granted against Krause. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12815 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
) and 939.50(3)(b) (2011-12).[1] Upon Sorenson’s no contest plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-five year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04

James R. Schilling v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Gorden complain that the trial court considered materials outside the pleadings when it corresponded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6856 - 2005-03-31

State v. David Entis Rees
. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that three of the photos showed a “lewd exhibition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Black River Falls v. Douglas W. Spencer
, modification or reversal of existing law. We therefore remand the matter to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11667 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
Reel argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28353 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] NOTICE
to a breath test for intoxication reasonable. The State argues the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28783 - 2014-09-15