Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 33331 - 33340 of 58510 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
The following facts are taken from trial testimony and the circuit court’s findings. On January 15, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30881 - 2007-11-14
The following facts are taken from trial testimony and the circuit court’s findings. On January 15, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30881 - 2007-11-14
CA Blank Order
) and 939.50(3)(b) (2011-12).[1] Upon Sorenson’s no contest plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-five year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
) and 939.50(3)(b) (2011-12).[1] Upon Sorenson’s no contest plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-five year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
CA Blank Order
with intent to deliver heroin which was entered upon his guilty plea following the trial court’s denial of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
with intent to deliver heroin which was entered upon his guilty plea following the trial court’s denial of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Miller
from the arrest, claiming there was no probable cause for arrest. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
from the arrest, claiming there was no probable cause for arrest. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal is whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
on appeal is whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record discloses no arguable basis for challenging the effectiveness of Jensen’s trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196987 - 2017-09-26
. The record discloses no arguable basis for challenging the effectiveness of Jensen’s trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196987 - 2017-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Patrick B.
. EDWARD STENGEL, Judge. Affirmed. ANDERSON, J. The State appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12291 - 2017-09-21
. EDWARD STENGEL, Judge. Affirmed. ANDERSON, J. The State appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12291 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at 1 The Hon. Randy Koschnick presided over the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
at 1 The Hon. Randy Koschnick presided over the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At the postconviction motion hearing, Scott’s trial counsel, Jonathan LaVoy, testified that in the course of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95062 - 2014-09-15
At the postconviction motion hearing, Scott’s trial counsel, Jonathan LaVoy, testified that in the course of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95062 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
id., ¶6. ¶6 Foster’s trial attorney did not object to any perceived or potential breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105319 - 2017-09-21
id., ¶6. ¶6 Foster’s trial attorney did not object to any perceived or potential breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105319 - 2017-09-21