Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33341 - 33350 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Mark W. Roob
, claiming that the check was nonrefundable. Because the wedding was only three months away and they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4665 - 2017-09-19

State v. David J. Lenz
the parent fails to pay support arrearages previously incurred. He claims that whether one pays arrearages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15331 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13

State v. Walter T. Missouri
seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Missouri claims: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21670 - 2008-06-16

Raquel R. S. and K.B. v. Necedah Area School District
obligation in § 48.981(3)(a); the acts of the District employees that form the basis for the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5037 - 2010-12-06

[PDF] NOTICE
contends that his trial counsel, Attorney Michael Barth, rendered ineffective assistance. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60436 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
with Robert. She claims it was error to not use the shared placement formula in setting child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-06-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. The familiar two-pronged test for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims requires a defendant to prove both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40458 - 2014-11-25

[PDF] Kickers of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
summary judgment claiming to be the beneficial owner of the property. The trial court granted Kickers's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8018 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45233 - 2010-01-05