Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33341 - 33350 of 43230 for t o.
Search results 33341 - 33350 of 43230 for t o.
COURT OF APPEALS
and adversely affected his defense. He contends that “[t]he jury could well have found the state witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
and adversely affected his defense. He contends that “[t]he jury could well have found the state witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
State v. Troy D. Forler
the defendant’s theory. See id. However, “[t]he key word in the rule is ‘reasonable.’ The rule does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15335 - 2005-03-31
the defendant’s theory. See id. However, “[t]he key word in the rule is ‘reasonable.’ The rule does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15335 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
thusly: [I]t is the defendant’s position that the statute that we’re referring to and relying upon, [Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97605 - 2013-06-03
thusly: [I]t is the defendant’s position that the statute that we’re referring to and relying upon, [Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97605 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” See id. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142665 - 2017-09-21
as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” See id. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Superior v. Hunter Hill
for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.1 Hunter Hill and Wendy Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5185 - 2017-09-19
for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.1 Hunter Hill and Wendy Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5185 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David J. Brock
.” State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 59, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). Rather, “[t]he law of investigative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7631 - 2017-09-19
.” State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 59, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). Rather, “[t]he law of investigative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7631 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Derek E.
because “[i]t takes literally months to get into court on ... a sanction violation, it takes at least
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13282 - 2017-09-21
because “[i]t takes literally months to get into court on ... a sanction violation, it takes at least
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 24, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 24, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
State v. Gregg R. Madden
“[t]he trial court personally questioned the defendant concerning the form. It asked the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14093 - 2005-03-31
“[t]he trial court personally questioned the defendant concerning the form. It asked the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14093 - 2005-03-31
State v. Katie H.
that six-month time period and “[t]here should be some supervision during that minimum period of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5601 - 2005-03-31
that six-month time period and “[t]here should be some supervision during that minimum period of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5601 - 2005-03-31