Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33351 - 33360 of 61654 for does.
Search results 33351 - 33360 of 61654 for does.
COURT OF APPEALS
does not need to specifically reference the statute or utter the words “good cause” in order to invoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31511 - 2008-01-14
does not need to specifically reference the statute or utter the words “good cause” in order to invoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31511 - 2008-01-14
State v. Sammy R. Ramirez
to defuse Villarreal's desire for a confrontation. The evidence established that Ramirez does not avert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8887 - 2005-03-31
to defuse Villarreal's desire for a confrontation. The evidence established that Ramirez does not avert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8887 - 2005-03-31
Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
to reopen the original action, he understandably does not quarrel with Judge Davis’s rejection of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
to reopen the original action, he understandably does not quarrel with Judge Davis’s rejection of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court’s denial of Jones’ motions to suppress. See Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10) (plea does not preclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
to the circuit court’s denial of Jones’ motions to suppress. See Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10) (plea does not preclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
State v. Benjay E. Kohanski
repeater status during the above plea colloquy. It does not contend that it proved his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
repeater status during the above plea colloquy. It does not contend that it proved his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
City of Onalaska v. Terry J. Prien
be paid in full in order to file an appeal in a case. It is my position that the statute does not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16227 - 2005-03-31
be paid in full in order to file an appeal in a case. It is my position that the statute does not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16227 - 2005-03-31
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
does not explicate, and this court fails to appreciate why, these distinctions are material. Would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
does not explicate, and this court fails to appreciate why, these distinctions are material. Would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
determined that Buchanan is entitled to credit for that time, and the State does not dispute that finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
determined that Buchanan is entitled to credit for that time, and the State does not dispute that finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
CA Blank Order
to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication. [With an exception that does not apply here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication. [With an exception that does not apply here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
State v. Jeffrey Benes
, 325 N.W.2d 703 (1982), this court should too. Because the Fencl case does not say whether Fencl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31
, 325 N.W.2d 703 (1982), this court should too. Because the Fencl case does not say whether Fencl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31