Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33351 - 33360 of 46060 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 33351 - 33360 of 46060 for paternity test paper work.
State v. James R. Sieger
test requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient—that counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12702 - 2005-03-31
test requires the defendant to show that counsel’s performance was deficient—that counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12702 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not survive the Sullivan test anyway because, rather than proving knowledge or absence of mistake, it tended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81547 - 2012-05-01
not survive the Sullivan test anyway because, rather than proving knowledge or absence of mistake, it tended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81547 - 2012-05-01
State v. Kenny L. Warren
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
). The manifest injustice test is satisfied by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
Travelers Insurance Company v. Robert J. Sconzert
. The “fairly debatable” test is an objective one, which asks whether a reasonable insurer under similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20157 - 2005-11-08
. The “fairly debatable” test is an objective one, which asks whether a reasonable insurer under similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20157 - 2005-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stronger” test relative to appellate counsel, not postconviction counsel. No. 2014AP1329 6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
stronger” test relative to appellate counsel, not postconviction counsel. No. 2014AP1329 6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is set out in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). The test involves balancing three factors: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191395 - 2017-09-21
is set out in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). The test involves balancing three factors: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stipulation was that, according to forensic tests, shell casings recovered from the shots-fired location
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242082 - 2019-06-20
stipulation was that, according to forensic tests, shell casings recovered from the shots-fired location
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242082 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Danny L. Peterson
.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Veronica J.
., ¶41. In reaching this conclusion, the court assessed the three-factor test: “the private interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20687 - 2017-09-21
., ¶41. In reaching this conclusion, the court assessed the three-factor test: “the private interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Waites
and preclude their use in evidence unless pretrial notice was given to permit the opponent to test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
and preclude their use in evidence unless pretrial notice was given to permit the opponent to test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19