Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33361 - 33370 of 69170 for as he.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not say “exactly ‘why’ the offense was sexually motivated.” He is mistaken. It commented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182358 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
convinced him to enter a plea despite the fact that he wanted to go to trial. During the plea colloquy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157366 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
that he did not pay for. The conduct report also stated that an investigation revealed that inmate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102126 - 2013-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
is typically barred, if filed after a direct appeal, unless the defendant shows a sufficient reason why he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65587 - 2011-06-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. He contends: the sentencing court erred by placing too much weight on some factors in the face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105988 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
no contest to one count of child enticement, and he was convicted on the basis of his plea. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780433 - 2024-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. Perkins’s brief is mostly indecipherable. He appears to argue that he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28930 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] State v. Ralph E. Harris
with a copy of the no merit report, and Harris was advised that he could respond to the report. Harris has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8813 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1) he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149311 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of his extended supervision and an order denying his motion for a new reconfinement hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68379 - 2014-09-15