Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33361 - 33370 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33361 - 33370 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
State v. Latasha J.
the case until September 5, 2002, so that Latasha could speak with her attorney and decide how to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6060 - 2005-03-31
the case until September 5, 2002, so that Latasha could speak with her attorney and decide how to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6060 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
The issue in this case is whether the trial court correctly granted Brockdorf’s motion seeking to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
The issue in this case is whether the trial court correctly granted Brockdorf’s motion seeking to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paul Peltonen v. Brian Richtig
of the witnesses, reinstated Rittenhouse in the case after previously dismissing her, and used her son's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14905 - 2017-09-21
of the witnesses, reinstated Rittenhouse in the case after previously dismissing her, and used her son's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discuss only that issue herein. No. 2022AP712 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15
discuss only that issue herein. No. 2022AP712 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
excerpts from Craig’s statements during its case-in-chief. The circuit court summarized Craig’s admissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70796 - 2011-09-12
excerpts from Craig’s statements during its case-in-chief. The circuit court summarized Craig’s admissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70796 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21162 - 2006-01-30
and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21162 - 2006-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
Williams was originally charged in this case in 2002. At a jury trial in March 2003, he was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29
Williams was originally charged in this case in 2002. At a jury trial in March 2003, he was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29
David Burch v. Village of Hammond
. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), should apply here. In Dolan, a case dealing with Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31
. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), should apply here. In Dolan, a case dealing with Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) means that courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case. The trial court agreed that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
) means that courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case. The trial court agreed that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08