Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33361 - 33370 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33361 - 33370 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nate Wilson
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn C. Picotte
in Swanson supports Picotte's argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10323 - 2017-09-20
in Swanson supports Picotte's argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10323 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
duplicates untainted evidence, the relative strength and weakness of the State’s case and the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
duplicates untainted evidence, the relative strength and weakness of the State’s case and the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terry A. Givens
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11264 - 2017-09-19
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11264 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
properly exercised its discretion, we affirm. This case arises from a dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
properly exercised its discretion, we affirm. This case arises from a dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31