Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33371 - 33380 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33371 - 33380 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
provide a DNA sample. See Wis. Stat. § 973.047 (2009-10).[1] In certain sexual assault cases, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
provide a DNA sample. See Wis. Stat. § 973.047 (2009-10).[1] In certain sexual assault cases, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
Susan R. Schlough v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company
N.W.2d at 105-06. The rule applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 105-06. The rule applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31
Peter J. Steen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because Oligny had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12129 - 2005-03-31
the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because Oligny had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
Certification
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2003
2003 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30 - 2005-03-31
2003 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry A. Givens
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11264 - 2005-03-31
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11264 - 2005-03-31