Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33371 - 33380 of 58492 for speedy trial.

State v. Louise M. Firkus
.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶10 A trial court’s decision on the reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7523 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brown County Human Services Department v. Kathy M.
terminating her parental rights to her children. Kathy argues the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6257 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Henry A. Phillips
., and the postconviction order. On appeal, Phillips argues that the trial court erred when it enhanced his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13887 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the case was tried to the court. After post-trial briefing, the court issued a written decision awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173773 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Elm Grove v. Tina Fleming
that the trial court erroneously denied her motion to suppress evidence because there was no probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5138 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to introduce other acts evidence at trial to refute any claim of accident or self-defense. The evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165554 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pled not guilty, and the case went to a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Deputy Miller testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS
court commissioner and the trial court judged in favor of Borkowski, awarding him $3500 in damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143063 - 2015-06-16

State v. Shirlene Davis
claims that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence seized as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16037 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. At trial, the State proceeded with a “homosexual overkill” theory of homicide, and the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072196 - 2026-02-04