Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33381 - 33390 of 58492 for speedy trial.

State v. Daniel M. Faken
the defendant’s vehicle. We reverse the trial court’s denial of Daniel M. Faken’s motion to suppress because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14244 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at sentencing, and Stibbe’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial, of first-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of thirteen. Turk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711206 - 2023-10-11

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. At trial, the State proceeded with a “homosexual overkill” theory of homicide, and the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072196 - 2026-02-04

[PDF] Supreme Court rules petition 12-03
the following rules: SECTION 1. 804.01 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read: 804.01 (2) (c) Trial
/supreme/docs/1203petition.pdf - 2012-02-21

[PDF] Brown County Human Services Department v. Kathy M.
terminating her parental rights to her children. Kathy argues the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6256 - 2017-09-19

Craig Pech v. Terri Racine
argues that the trial court misinterpreted a policy exclusion to deny coverage. We agree. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7286 - 2005-03-31

Christine L. Elfers v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
, for The Civil Trial Counsel of Wisconsin. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11812 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dustin W. B.
ANDERSON, J.[1] We affirm the trial court’s denial of Dustin W. B.’s motions challenging the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of abandonment and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167989 - 2017-09-21