Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33381 - 33390 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Donyil Anderson
. .... THE COURT: [Prosecutor], had this matter gone to trial, what would the State have been prepared to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10935 - 2017-09-20

Village of Elm Grove v. Tina Fleming
the influence (OWI). Fleming argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
was responsible for the trial. ¶6 R.G. agreed to retain Attorney Pierquet and his colleague on a contingent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
three were “potty trained” during the day by the time of trial. This responsibility fell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108453 - 2017-09-21

State v. Emmett J. Wimmer
. DISCUSSION ¶6 When reviewing a trial court’s determination regarding constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5762 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
appeals from an order dismissing her petition for revision of a Nebraska divorce judgment. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
: Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the trial court erred in excluding from the maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49969 - 2010-05-17

State v. Daniel B. Knutson
. VERGERONT, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals the trial court's decision granting Daniel Knutson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11157 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Christine L. Elfers v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
by David G. Peterson of Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C. Milwaukee, for The Civil Trial Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11812 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scott A. Defere
to emergency circumstances. The trial court found that the officers were motivated by a perceived need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5941 - 2005-03-31