Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3341 - 3350 of 16451 for commenting.

[PDF] May a newly-elected judge lease office space to a lawyer as part of an agreement between the judge and the lawyer for the purchase of the judge's law practice?
. . . . The comment to this rule notes that public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902 - 2017-09-20

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
to the jury that [was] just a matter of a fairly passing comment in [the] proceedings ….” Connie decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
counsel was ineffective for failing to object when the prosecutor commented during closing argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197721 - 2017-10-10

2007 WI APP 222
, Turnpaugh’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument turns on whether his comment to Ferguson that he was “looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30332 - 2007-10-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
comments simply informed jurors of the applicable legal standard, inquired as to whether they would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189547 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
contends that changes in parole policy constitute a new factor.[2] He cites a single comment by Judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138442 - 2015-03-31

[PDF] Patricia Flowers v. Howard A. Newton
or a reasonable person in her position would have or should have known that fact. Second, the comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11805 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Grenie, however, takes the “credible people” comment out of context. In context, the court tempers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
motion, reasoning that the sentencing court’s comments about Graham’s mandatory release date were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34908 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
not specifically explain why it disagreed with the sentencing recommendations, it referenced the comments from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23