Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3341 - 3350 of 44710 for part.

National Auto Truckstops, Inc. v. State
frontage along Highway 12 as part of a planned reconstruction of the intersection. In addition, the DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5282 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
, in relevant part: "A petition for review of any such change in the bylaws will be entertained by the court
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donnie Lee Lacy
, however, was not made part of the record during the State's case. After the State rested, Lacy moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9808 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
on the part of Anna, and create the potential for long-term health consequences to her. He contends that Anna
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65159 - 2011-05-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
Schoenecker. ¶4 Attorney Schoenecker repaid part of the loan balance. At some point the former fiancée
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251320 - 2019-12-13

COURT OF APPEALS
for a two-part analysis. The first part presents questions of law, and requires an identity of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62849 - 2011-04-13

Toumkham Rabideau v. Milan W. Stiller
of jurisdiction. To establish whether a pleading is fatally defective, we apply a two-part test. See Schaefer v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25

[PDF] Mehran Heydarpour v. Stone Dimensions, Inc.
: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26176 - 2017-09-21

State v. Phonesavanh Vanmanivong
. EDWARD STENGEL, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3335 - 2005-03-31

State v. Corey R. Saxby
violated, we look to the four-part balancing test in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972): (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5967 - 2005-03-31