Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the vehicle was diminished by $7,000 because of a defect. ¶10 In ruling on post-verdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94403 - 2013-03-20
of the vehicle was diminished by $7,000 because of a defect. ¶10 In ruling on post-verdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94403 - 2013-03-20
[PDF]
Darryn Reid v. Leanna R. Benz
and that a motion regarding coverage would be heard in April, 1999. ¶7 In March, 1999, American Family moved
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16344 - 2017-09-21
and that a motion regarding coverage would be heard in April, 1999. ¶7 In March, 1999, American Family moved
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16344 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
, in violation of § 161.41(1m), Stats., 1991-92.[1] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
, in violation of § 161.41(1m), Stats., 1991-92.[1] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chet Woodward
contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to withdraw his no contest plea and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12378 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to withdraw his no contest plea and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12378 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darwin J. Pamanet
after suspension. Pamanet contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13605 - 2005-03-31
after suspension. Pamanet contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13605 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley D. Muck
by denying his pretrial motion to exclude the results of a blood alcohol content test that was not properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
by denying his pretrial motion to exclude the results of a blood alcohol content test that was not properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s motion to withdraw. We reject Walker’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 According to the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120183 - 2014-08-25
counsel’s motion to withdraw. We reject Walker’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 According to the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120183 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree sexual assault. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
-degree sexual assault. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the evidence was obtained through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208752 - 2018-02-22
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the evidence was obtained through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208752 - 2018-02-22
Tina Harmon v. City of Milwaukee
the comparative negligence of the parties. The City claims: (1) the trial court erred when it ruled on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13045 - 2005-03-31
the comparative negligence of the parties. The City claims: (1) the trial court erred when it ruled on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13045 - 2005-03-31