Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not contend that she requested a jury trial prior to the end of the initial hearing, nor does she claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082075 - 2026-02-24
not contend that she requested a jury trial prior to the end of the initial hearing, nor does she claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082075 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Melton
. Melton claims the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when it refused to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21
. Melton claims the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when it refused to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his claims against Sacred Heart Hospital and awarding Sacred Heart $257,182.58 on its counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73888 - 2014-09-15
his claims against Sacred Heart Hospital and awarding Sacred Heart $257,182.58 on its counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
novo a party’s claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion because it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20
novo a party’s claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion because it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35230 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168003 - 2017-09-21
the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168003 - 2017-09-21
State v. Taurius S. Fluker
for postconviction relief.[1] He claims that his trial was unlawfully infected by a part of the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[1] He claims that his trial was unlawfully infected by a part of the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the sentence of his accomplice in the crimes. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31561 - 2014-09-15
to the sentence of his accomplice in the crimes. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31561 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
” rule when dividing the couple’s property. Juan also claims that the trial court erred by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84802 - 2012-07-11
” rule when dividing the couple’s property. Juan also claims that the trial court erred by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84802 - 2012-07-11
State v. Anthony Lentowski
bases this claim on his belief that he was prejudiced by defense counsel’s errors because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
bases this claim on his belief that he was prejudiced by defense counsel’s errors because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it’s something to that extent.” The father also claimed to have said, “[I]f I did it, I had done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36843 - 2009-06-17
it’s something to that extent.” The father also claimed to have said, “[I]f I did it, I had done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36843 - 2009-06-17