Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8902 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8902 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nate Wilson
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jimmie A. Woodford v. Dorothy Bolter
” and that “Woodford afraid of being interrogated by me”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
” and that “Woodford afraid of being interrogated by me”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Peter J. Steen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
either the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12129 - 2017-09-21
either the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Susan Triggs
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16024 - 2017-09-21
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16024 - 2017-09-21
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Shawn C. Picotte
in Swanson supports Picotte's argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10323 - 2017-09-20
in Swanson supports Picotte's argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10323 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Supreme Court case law. Based upon our review 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
Supreme Court case law. Based upon our review 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09