Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33401 - 33410 of 68246 for law.

WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1922-CR Complete Tit...
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Matthew S. Pinix of Law offices of Matthew S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83719 - 2012-07-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of law. While a Court can, and in some instances should, do independent legal research
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82437 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David Allen Bruski
of property law” govern Fourth Amendment claims. Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 105 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law and fact. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633- 34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). “[W]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174809 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
modification. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d at 8. ¶5 Whether a fact constitutes a new factor is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4656 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Janis Peters-Doering v. American Continental Insurance Company
585, 590 (1983) (“Wisconsin law … requires … that five- sixths of the jury agree … on all questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11640 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
). ¶9 The meaning of a statute and its application to undisputed facts are questions of law reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33329 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Paul Price
rationale, is based on facts of record and involves no error of law. Id. at 367, 497 N.W.2d at 149
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9602 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Stacey R.W.
). The question is whether such error was harmless. Wisconsin law establishes that the error is harmless unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3131 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gwen L.P.
governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10488 - 2017-09-20