Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33411 - 33420 of 61654 for does.
Search results 33411 - 33420 of 61654 for does.
Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
to reopen the original action, he understandably does not quarrel with Judge Davis’s rejection of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
to reopen the original action, he understandably does not quarrel with Judge Davis’s rejection of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court’s denial of Jones’ motions to suppress. See Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10) (plea does not preclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
to the circuit court’s denial of Jones’ motions to suppress. See Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10) (plea does not preclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
State v. Benjay E. Kohanski
repeater status during the above plea colloquy. It does not contend that it proved his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
repeater status during the above plea colloquy. It does not contend that it proved his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
City of Onalaska v. Terry J. Prien
be paid in full in order to file an appeal in a case. It is my position that the statute does not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16227 - 2005-03-31
be paid in full in order to file an appeal in a case. It is my position that the statute does not allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16227 - 2005-03-31
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
does not explicate, and this court fails to appreciate why, these distinctions are material. Would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
does not explicate, and this court fails to appreciate why, these distinctions are material. Would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
determined that Buchanan is entitled to credit for that time, and the State does not dispute that finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
determined that Buchanan is entitled to credit for that time, and the State does not dispute that finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
CA Blank Order
to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication. [With an exception that does not apply here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication. [With an exception that does not apply here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
State v. Jeffrey Benes
, 325 N.W.2d 703 (1982), this court should too. Because the Fencl case does not say whether Fencl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31
, 325 N.W.2d 703 (1982), this court should too. Because the Fencl case does not say whether Fencl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
in admitting such evidence. Id., ¶34. An erroneous exercise of discretion does not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27439 - 2006-12-19
in admitting such evidence. Id., ¶34. An erroneous exercise of discretion does not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27439 - 2006-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Merrick testified that use of the actuarial instruments does not tell the entire story
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72457 - 2011-10-17
. ¶5 Merrick testified that use of the actuarial instruments does not tell the entire story
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72457 - 2011-10-17