Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33411 - 33420 of 57196 for id.
Search results 33411 - 33420 of 57196 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. Therefore, we independently review whether the officer’s observation of Pudlow’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54504 - 2010-09-15
de novo. Id. Therefore, we independently review whether the officer’s observation of Pudlow’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54504 - 2010-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
debtor’s assets. See id. at 649. The clear difference in Badger Lines is that the creditor claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89520 - 2014-09-15
debtor’s assets. See id. at 649. The clear difference in Badger Lines is that the creditor claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89520 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lindsey A. Fritz
must provide a rational and explainable basis for the sentence. Id. It must specify the objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7586 - 2005-03-31
must provide a rational and explainable basis for the sentence. Id. It must specify the objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7586 - 2005-03-31
Logemann Brothers Company v. Redlin Browne
that the IRS uses to close and compromise cases.[2] Id. at 555. After the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9861 - 2005-03-31
that the IRS uses to close and compromise cases.[2] Id. at 555. After the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9861 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the sentencing factors that it viewed as relevant to achieving those objectives. See id., ¶¶40-43
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245270 - 2019-08-14
the sentencing factors that it viewed as relevant to achieving those objectives. See id., ¶¶40-43
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245270 - 2019-08-14
[PDF]
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
(Ct. App. 1990). It is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 846-47, 454 N.W.2d at 58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9009 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1990). It is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 846-47, 454 N.W.2d at 58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jackie C.
because testimony safeguards accurate fact- finding and protects the parents,” id. at ¶56, and although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5341 - 2017-09-19
because testimony safeguards accurate fact- finding and protects the parents,” id. at ¶56, and although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5341 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
findings and order. See id. at 580. Absent a clear showing of an erroneous exercise of discretion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45943 - 2014-09-15
findings and order. See id. at 580. Absent a clear showing of an erroneous exercise of discretion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45943 - 2014-09-15
Adam Austin-White v. Todd C. Young
much concerned with causation as it is with defining the risk for which coverage will be afforded.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7445 - 2005-03-31
much concerned with causation as it is with defining the risk for which coverage will be afforded.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ed Fett v. Thomas A. Luksetich
for which they bargained. Id. In reviewing an arbitration award, the courts are guided by the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10586 - 2017-09-20
for which they bargained. Id. In reviewing an arbitration award, the courts are guided by the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10586 - 2017-09-20