Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33411 - 33420 of 63537 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was made part of this record, and that it was “not necessary” for Officer Bowe to testify as to facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167017 - 2017-09-21

State v. Frankie Groenke
stolen from him. Groenke’s counsel placed a continuing foundational objection on the record, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to be found in the record. ¶5 Sentencing is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101681 - 2013-09-09

COURT OF APPEALS
of the Congressional record that, if anything, contradicts his argument. This portion of the Congressional record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146596 - 2015-08-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, as is typical, “this approach requires a court to examine the record of a prior proceeding, taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27228 - 2014-09-15

State v. Milton H. Smith
, a more detailed review of Smith’s driving record revealed two prior OWI convictions, which occurred July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
separately and in turn. ¶9 The record reflects that Gilliam was diagnosed with PTSD in March 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09

County of Adams v. Daniel M. Ciesla
a directed verdict] unless the record reveals that the circuit court was “clearly wrong.” Weiss v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15461 - 2005-03-31

Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
determination of egregiousness is supported by the facts of record and are thorough. There would be no good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4240 - 2005-03-31

Jose DeJesus Fuentes v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV
remitted the record to the circuit court clerk. Although he did not receive the court’s written decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17405 - 2005-03-31