Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33421 - 33430 of 74552 for public records.

[PDF] WI App 49
and Public Affairs, WRA is a non-stock corporation whose members are “residential and commercial real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980254 - 2025-09-18

COURT OF APPEALS
or sleeping too much ….” Barnes’ review of Madelyn’s medical records led him to conclude that her injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61234 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] WI APP 17
of Melinda A. Swartz assistant state public defender of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91595 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
relied on the guidelines. Our review of the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4464 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert Donald Lewerenz v. Jane Carol Lewerenz
determination must be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12749 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
that the defendants were entitled to public employee immunity for discretionary acts under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2018AP265 7 are as follows: (1) the defendant made to one or more members of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238937 - 2019-04-11

State v. Tartorius Allen
was submitted on the briefs of Steven D. Phillips, Assistant State Public Defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14143 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eugene W.
, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the petitioner-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4330 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith B.
and the facts of the record. See id. If we can discern a reasonable basis for its evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14225 - 2005-03-31