Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33421 - 33430 of 63277 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. [3] The only record citation Portmann provides with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145111 - 2015-07-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record of past drunk driving offenses. ¶7 The State’s toxicology expert explained how alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118087 - 2014-09-15

Diane Jessup v. Banc One Building Management Corporation
concluded that the evidentiary record was devoid of evidence that Banc One had notice of the hazardous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9267 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
to do so.” We have reviewed the record; it confirms Johnson’s position. The State, citing State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11939 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
department of transportation (DOT) records, police verified Thimm’s address, which had been provided to DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143838 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The only record citation Portmann provides with respect to this argument is to a transcript of a January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145111 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 973.155 (2019-20).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
§ 704.27). Further, the record does not support the court’s reconsideration determination that Hanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108174 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronan T. Heaney
a “third version” of the facts not found in the record in order to support its conclusion that Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6168 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Darryl D. Johnson
), on the record, with the approval of the court and the consent of the state.” In Livingston, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11785 - 2017-09-20