Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33431 - 33440 of 58479 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. John R. Jagusch
jury trial, Jagusch was convicted. He now appeals the judgment of conviction. The first issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11783 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Mason complains that his trial counsel referred to his conduct as being “repetitious and dangerous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115394 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Linda Goldbeck v. Roger Martin
that the Goldbecks were causally negligent; and (2) whether the trial court erred when it instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11570 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
that there was contraband on Purtell’s computers. ¶8 A jury trial was held, and the jury found Purtell guilty of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06

State v. Jeffrey Sailing
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Jeffery Sailing appeals from a trial court order revoking his operating privileges upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 948.12(1m) (2005-06).[1] Jensen argues the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
orders could result in a default finding where she would lose her right to have a trial. ¶5 On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685119 - 2023-08-01

[PDF] Gerald T. Carroll v. Town of Balsam Lake
the adjoining landowners quiet title.1 The Town argues that the trial court misapplied § 80.32 STATS. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10718 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
in person at the scheduled jury trial. In addition, she insists that the court’s failure to take evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3921 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] John A. Zulliger v. Town of Harding
on sovereign immunity grounds because the Zulligers did not appeal the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2482 - 2017-09-19