Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33441 - 33450 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 33441 - 33450 of 83945 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
municipal court judgment in this case was based on a City prosecution of Peterson for an ongoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165192 - 2017-09-21
municipal court judgment in this case was based on a City prosecution of Peterson for an ongoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165192 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeanne M. Hanson
. May 8, 2001), and we have considered whether we should hold this case until the supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4256 - 2017-09-19
. May 8, 2001), and we have considered whether we should hold this case until the supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had paid the remaining damages, and that the parties were agreeing to dismiss the case, “subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175345 - 2017-09-21
had paid the remaining damages, and that the parties were agreeing to dismiss the case, “subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175345 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as a victim witness in a different case. The circuit court rejected this claim without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35365 - 2009-01-28
as a victim witness in a different case. The circuit court rejected this claim without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35365 - 2009-01-28
State v. Hiram Johnson
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
conviction on both counts is barred by statute. We remand the case for further proceedings. Johnson’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11498 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2012-07-31
dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655255 - 2023-05-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655255 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to it. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
to it. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
trial, and (4) the court proceeded to trial without notice and while the case was on appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28318 - 2007-03-05
trial, and (4) the court proceeded to trial without notice and while the case was on appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28318 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
Janice L. Geline v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
the judgment against Barglind. This case arose as a result of a prior case, Geline v. Auto-Owners Insur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11454 - 2017-09-19
the judgment against Barglind. This case arose as a result of a prior case, Geline v. Auto-Owners Insur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11454 - 2017-09-19