Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33441 - 33450 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 33441 - 33450 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Donyil Anderson
. .... THE COURT: [Prosecutor], had this matter gone to trial, what would the State have been prepared to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10935 - 2017-09-20
. .... THE COURT: [Prosecutor], had this matter gone to trial, what would the State have been prepared to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10935 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Robert D. Haylock
hearing. Following that hearing, the trial court made numerous findings which we summarize. Allen has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9294 - 2017-09-19
hearing. Following that hearing, the trial court made numerous findings which we summarize. Allen has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9294 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing, and Stibbe’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object. The postconviction court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
at sentencing, and Stibbe’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object. The postconviction court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues the trial court erred by concluding Daniel’s partnership interest in No. 2008AP1943 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45974 - 2014-09-15
argues the trial court erred by concluding Daniel’s partnership interest in No. 2008AP1943 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45974 - 2014-09-15
Craig Pech v. Terri Racine
argues that the trial court misinterpreted a policy exclusion to deny coverage. We agree. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7286 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court misinterpreted a policy exclusion to deny coverage. We agree. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7286 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel M. Faken
the defendant’s vehicle. We reverse the trial court’s denial of Daniel M. Faken’s motion to suppress because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14244 - 2005-03-31
the defendant’s vehicle. We reverse the trial court’s denial of Daniel M. Faken’s motion to suppress because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14244 - 2005-03-31
Village of Elm Grove v. Tina Fleming
the influence (OWI). Fleming argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
the influence (OWI). Fleming argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
State v. Louise M. Firkus
.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶10 A trial court’s decision on the reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7523 - 2005-03-31
.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶10 A trial court’s decision on the reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7523 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2009AP1160 3 Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the trial court erred in excluding from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49969 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP1160 3 Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the trial court erred in excluding from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49969 - 2014-09-15
Gerald T. Carroll v. Town of Balsam Lake
, and granting the adjoining landowners quiet title.[1] The Town argues that the trial court misapplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10718 - 2005-03-31
, and granting the adjoining landowners quiet title.[1] The Town argues that the trial court misapplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10718 - 2005-03-31