Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33451 - 33460 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Leonard Avery
. He and Andre remained outside. Roby claimed that after waiting several minutes, Leonard walked out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9779 - 2017-09-19

State v. Domingo G. Ramirez
on both the delivery and possession counts. Domingo first claims that the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13851 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carl F. Hickman
as a repeat offender and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James E. Asbury
counsel expected Asbury to testify, Asbury decided not to do so. Asbury’s claim that he was ignored
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21696 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ruth M. Bendimez v. Allen M. Neidermire and Cecelia E. Neidermire
their motion for summary judgment. The appellants claim the trial court erred by concluding that service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13710 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Appeal No. 2007AP1396 Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV194
for a statutory civil claim, no right can be inferred. 1 See
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33133 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
because he failed to explore her sleep apnea and introduce testimony about it at trial. She claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6345 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mutual Service Insurance Companies v. Brian Betterley
scene. ¶6 Betterley claimed in depositions and at trial that when he first got out of his truck he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7307 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Mark Miller v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
. § 895.52, bars the Millers’ claim against the City. Alternatively, the Millers argue that their claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5375 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ismael T. Lopez
. Lopez claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Lopez’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24604 - 2017-09-21