Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33451 - 33460 of 46054 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
and unparticularized suspicion or ‘hunch,’” Terry, 443 U.S. at 27. We apply an objective test, id., 392 U.S. at 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05

James Schuette v. Ronald L. Van De Hey
of such enforcement." See 2A McQuillin, Municipal Corporations § 10.06 at 311 (3d ed. 1996). "The crucial test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10387 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. However, we need not address the prejudice prong of the test if deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31

Taylor Vincent Powers v. Terry Dachel
as a matter of law. Id. The supreme court in Linville set forth the test to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13588 - 2005-03-31

Sheboygan County v. Cheryl L. M.
N.W.2d 103 (1996). However, the application of the facts to the statutory test for commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3682 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael G.
. A preliminary breath test showed his blood alcohol content at .11%. After advising Michael of his Miranda[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. Id. ¶14 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31758 - 2008-02-12

State v. Paul L. Bathe
cause is determined by applying the totality of the circumstances test. "The task of the issuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10032 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of criminal activity. What constitutes a reasonable suspicion is a commonsense test. See State v. Waldner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2006-12-05

[PDF] NOTICE
.2d at 437. ¶8 We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under the two- prong test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30039 - 2014-09-15