Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33461 - 33470 of 98504 for civil court case status online.
Search results 33461 - 33470 of 98504 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
to argue the merits of his case, that would have been appropriate at the Municipal Court trial, had he been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93963 - 2013-03-11
to argue the merits of his case, that would have been appropriate at the Municipal Court trial, had he been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93963 - 2013-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court did not find this to be the case, and the facts do not support such a conclusion. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
, the trial court did not find this to be the case, and the facts do not support such a conclusion. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2008-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2008-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and not suggestive of partiality or improper motive, the case was tried to the court and there was no risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20
and not suggestive of partiality or improper motive, the case was tried to the court and there was no risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to this court dated October 30, 2012, asking that we “re-docket” his case. He explained that his lawyer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104150 - 2013-11-12
to this court dated October 30, 2012, asking that we “re-docket” his case. He explained that his lawyer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104150 - 2013-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35531 - 2009-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35531 - 2009-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. A trial court’s findings of fact concerning the circumstances of the case and counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39904 - 2009-08-25
. A trial court’s findings of fact concerning the circumstances of the case and counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39904 - 2009-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] The circuit court in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94653 - 2013-03-27
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] The circuit court in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94653 - 2013-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98081 - 2013-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98081 - 2013-06-18