Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33461 - 33470 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 33461 - 33470 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
Schillinger has not demonstrated prejudice. ¶9 Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims are analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
Schillinger has not demonstrated prejudice. ¶9 Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims are analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
Alec T. Ellsworth v. Laurie R. Ellsworth
the ability to pay the required sum. We reject Alec’s claims and affirm the order. ¶2 The parties were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6252 - 2017-09-19
the ability to pay the required sum. We reject Alec’s claims and affirm the order. ¶2 The parties were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6252 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Easton
intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence grounded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence grounded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3102 - 2017-09-20
Pamela Sue Sieben v. Bruce Raymond Sieben
to interrogatories. She claims Bruce's answers indicated that he had listed a $1,288 payment to a furniture store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12442 - 2005-03-31
to interrogatories. She claims Bruce's answers indicated that he had listed a $1,288 payment to a furniture store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Lafayette was not eligible for the substance abuse program. Lafayette also claimed he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11
that Lafayette was not eligible for the substance abuse program. Lafayette also claimed he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Markham O. Mayne
postconviction motion. These claims of error are supported by only conclusory allegations of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16256 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion. These claims of error are supported by only conclusory allegations of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Montriel could raise an arguably meritorious claim related to the trial court’s rejection of a potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
Montriel could raise an arguably meritorious claim related to the trial court’s rejection of a potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Montriel could raise an arguably meritorious claim related to the trial court’s rejection of a potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
Montriel could raise an arguably meritorious claim related to the trial court’s rejection of a potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
[PDF]
State v. Jeris M. Moore
motion. He claims that No. 2005AP1204-CR 2 the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25748 - 2017-09-21
motion. He claims that No. 2005AP1204-CR 2 the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a judgment convicting him of eight counts of possession of child pornography. He claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481750 - 2022-02-08
appeals a judgment convicting him of eight counts of possession of child pornography. He claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481750 - 2022-02-08