Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33471 - 33480 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33471 - 33480 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] Emmit L. Groce, Jr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentence. Groce—who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
] Emmit L. Groce, Jr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentence. Groce—who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). McManamy contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=807970 - 2024-05-31
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). McManamy contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=807970 - 2024-05-31
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions; and (2) whether the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10433 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions; and (2) whether the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10433 - 2005-03-31
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions; and (2) whether the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10431 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions; and (2) whether the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10431 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alphonso Hubanks
orders denying his § 974.06, Stats., postconviction motion and his motion for reconsideration. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13385 - 2005-03-31
orders denying his § 974.06, Stats., postconviction motion and his motion for reconsideration. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13385 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
—will be granted only for sentences which are concurrent.”). Nederhoff filed a postconviction motion for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733555 - 2023-11-28
—will be granted only for sentences which are concurrent.”). Nederhoff filed a postconviction motion for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733555 - 2023-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2011-12).[1] Ingram argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134240 - 2015-02-02
) (2011-12).[1] Ingram argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134240 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of first degree intentional homicide. Banks argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
of first degree intentional homicide. Banks argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently filed an emergency motion to vacate and dismiss the refusal charge based on the address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30
subsequently filed an emergency motion to vacate and dismiss the refusal charge based on the address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30