Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33481 - 33490 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33481 - 33490 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing on McDaniel’s motion, the circuit court noted that “[t]estimony has indicated that members
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801416 - 2024-05-15
a hearing on McDaniel’s motion, the circuit court noted that “[t]estimony has indicated that members
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801416 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
State v. John P. Ganzhorn
to represent Ganzhorn on appeal. On Ganzhorn’s behalf, Kaftan filed a postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12549 - 2017-09-21
to represent Ganzhorn on appeal. On Ganzhorn’s behalf, Kaftan filed a postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12549 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Green Lake v. Clinton L. Duhm
. § 961.573(1). Duhm argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6056 - 2017-09-19
. § 961.573(1). Duhm argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6056 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2011-12)1 motion for postconviction relief. Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92338 - 2014-09-15
. § 974.06 (2011-12)1 motion for postconviction relief. Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92338 - 2014-09-15
Pekin Insurance Company v. H. Fuller & Sons, Inc.
of the August 2, 1993, hearing on Pekin's motion to compel discovery reveals that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8383 - 2005-03-31
of the August 2, 1993, hearing on Pekin's motion to compel discovery reveals that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, which the circuit court denied. The motion raised at least twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
and filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, which the circuit court denied. The motion raised at least twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sheila L. Hardnett
motion were that the trial court considered improper factors in sentencing and erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31
motion were that the trial court considered improper factors in sentencing and erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the exclusionary rule to deny his motion to suppress the results of a nonconsensual, warrantless blood draw. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894674 - 2024-12-26
to the exclusionary rule to deny his motion to suppress the results of a nonconsensual, warrantless blood draw. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894674 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
. Graham argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence, issued misleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103408 - 2013-10-28
. Graham argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence, issued misleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103408 - 2013-10-28