Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33491 - 33500 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33491 - 33500 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
City of Nekoosa v. Steven J. Melin
motion to preclude the City of Nekoosa from “automatically” admitting the results of an Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15652 - 2017-09-21
motion to preclude the City of Nekoosa from “automatically” admitting the results of an Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15652 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James W. Breseman
, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13647 - 2017-09-21
, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13647 - 2017-09-21
State v. Earl F. Beaver
, and from an order denying his motion to suppress the results of his blood test. Beaver contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4143 - 2005-03-31
, and from an order denying his motion to suppress the results of his blood test. Beaver contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. After the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116711 - 2017-09-21
. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. After the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116711 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for reconsideration of the $130,000 in restitution he was ordered to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
an order denying his motion for reconsideration of the $130,000 in restitution he was ordered to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions; and (2) whether the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions; and (2) whether the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31
State v. James H. Lindvig
his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment in opening statements; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment in opening statements; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)1g., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)1g., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On October 24, 2011, Morrison Transport filed a motion to vacate the default judgment, arguing primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92707 - 2014-09-15
. On October 24, 2011, Morrison Transport filed a motion to vacate the default judgment, arguing primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends the court should have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
contends the court should have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15