Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3351 - 3360 of 15277 for 2013.
Search results 3351 - 3360 of 15277 for 2013.
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141514 - 2015-05-06
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141514 - 2015-05-06
CA Blank Order
District II September 18, 2013 To: Hon. James L. Carlson Circuit Court Judge Walworth County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101949 - 2013-09-17
District II September 18, 2013 To: Hon. James L. Carlson Circuit Court Judge Walworth County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101949 - 2013-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
District IV September 24, 2013 To: Hon. William E. Hanrahan Circuit Court Judge, Br. 7 Dane
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102359 - 2013-09-23
District IV September 24, 2013 To: Hon. William E. Hanrahan Circuit Court Judge, Br. 7 Dane
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102359 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm. This case arises out of an encounter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168031 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm. This case arises out of an encounter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168031 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not satisfy the particularities of Wisconsin’s Statute of Frauds, WIS. STAT. § 706.02 (2013-14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161470 - 2017-09-21
not satisfy the particularities of Wisconsin’s Statute of Frauds, WIS. STAT. § 706.02 (2013-14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161470 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Outagamie Cty. v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607 (whether the county has put
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215003 - 2018-07-03
Outagamie Cty. v. Melanie L., 2013 WI 67, ¶39, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607 (whether the county has put
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215003 - 2018-07-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
764 days of sentence credit pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138784 - 2017-09-21
764 days of sentence credit pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or order, filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2013-14). 1 He argues that his motion was timely under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169701 - 2017-09-21
or order, filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2013-14). 1 He argues that his motion was timely under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169701 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144514 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144514 - 2017-09-21