Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3351 - 3360 of 21334 for warrants.
Search results 3351 - 3360 of 21334 for warrants.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that warrant modifying his sentence: the sentencing court’s mistaken belief that he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168269 - 2017-09-21
that warrant modifying his sentence: the sentencing court’s mistaken belief that he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne Williams
, Montgomery told Williams he would be taken into custody while the officers applied for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11507 - 2017-09-19
, Montgomery told Williams he would be taken into custody while the officers applied for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11507 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for a mistrial, opining that the testimony was not so direct and prejudicial as to warrant that remedy. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18
for a mistrial, opining that the testimony was not so direct and prejudicial as to warrant that remedy. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the information in the report prior to the trial. Thus, it was not newly discovered evidence warranting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
the information in the report prior to the trial. Thus, it was not newly discovered evidence warranting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review whether those facts No. 2016AP431-CR 5 warrant suppression. State v. Scull, 2015 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171154 - 2017-09-21
review whether those facts No. 2016AP431-CR 5 warrant suppression. State v. Scull, 2015 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171154 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
other officers executed a search warrant on Johnson’s and Krystal Finnigan’s residence. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
other officers executed a search warrant on Johnson’s and Krystal Finnigan’s residence. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained a warrant to search the computers.[2] The resulting further search revealed a large volume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
obtained a warrant to search the computers.[2] The resulting further search revealed a large volume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93766 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained a warrant to search the computers.2 The resulting further search revealed a large volume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93766 - 2014-09-15
obtained a warrant to search the computers.2 The resulting further search revealed a large volume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93766 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
failure to raise that argument. Williams’s claim was therefore insufficient to warrant an evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161788 - 2017-09-21
failure to raise that argument. Williams’s claim was therefore insufficient to warrant an evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161788 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Jones
reasonable suspicion that Jones was armed and therefore his search of Jones was warranted. However, Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
reasonable suspicion that Jones was armed and therefore his search of Jones was warranted. However, Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21