Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3351 - 3360 of 7627 for yes.
Search results 3351 - 3360 of 7627 for yes.
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
. The officer wrote “breath” for the type of test and marked the box next to “yes” because Hinzmann said he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
. The officer wrote “breath” for the type of test and marked the box next to “yes” because Hinzmann said he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven S. Miller
the case, Philip Stittleburg. One of the jurors, a Ms. Haugrud, replied: “Yes, he’s my attorney ….” She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16219 - 2017-09-21
the case, Philip Stittleburg. One of the jurors, a Ms. Haugrud, replied: “Yes, he’s my attorney ….” She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16219 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. James
inquiry is “yes” because the officer provided him with an “oversupply” of information. James refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7652 - 2017-09-19
inquiry is “yes” because the officer provided him with an “oversupply” of information. James refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7652 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
May a candidate for judicial office solicit campaign funds from close friends and others?
and members of the family? ANSWER Yes. FACTS A non-judge candidate for judicial office
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899 - 2017-09-20
and members of the family? ANSWER Yes. FACTS A non-judge candidate for judicial office
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899 - 2017-09-20
Allen J. Pronschinske v. Rupinder Singh, M.D.
of Karen K. Pronschinske?” ¶7 The jury answered “yes” to that question, with no dissenters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31
of Karen K. Pronschinske?” ¶7 The jury answered “yes” to that question, with no dissenters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven S. Miller
prosecuting the case, Philip Stittleburg. One of the jurors, a Ms. Haugrud, replied: “Yes, he’s my attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
prosecuting the case, Philip Stittleburg. One of the jurors, a Ms. Haugrud, replied: “Yes, he’s my attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
saw other than the horizontal nystagmus gaze test, McKay testified, “Yes.” Given the conflicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
saw other than the horizontal nystagmus gaze test, McKay testified, “Yes.” Given the conflicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“never said yes or no” to doing so. He stated, “I just did what I saw everybody else do.” ¶5 Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
“never said yes or no” to doing so. He stated, “I just did what I saw everybody else do.” ¶5 Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
answered yes to both questions. The court agreed that there was a factual basis for the pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039678 - 2025-11-20
answered yes to both questions. The court agreed that there was a factual basis for the pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039678 - 2025-11-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
against her will. Giese marked “Yes” to the question of whether the assault was Ashley’s first sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29154 - 2014-09-15
against her will. Giese marked “Yes” to the question of whether the assault was Ashley’s first sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29154 - 2014-09-15