Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33501 - 33510 of 58303 for speedy trial.
Search results 33501 - 33510 of 58303 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
clerk had been told the trial, which had originally been set for August 2010, would need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87920 - 2012-10-09
clerk had been told the trial, which had originally been set for August 2010, would need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87920 - 2012-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clerk had been told the trial, which had originally been set for August 2010, would need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87920 - 2014-09-15
clerk had been told the trial, which had originally been set for August 2010, would need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87920 - 2014-09-15
State v. Charles E. Young
the Fourth Amendment. Consequently, we uphold the trial court’s order denying Young’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7022 - 2005-03-31
the Fourth Amendment. Consequently, we uphold the trial court’s order denying Young’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7022 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tammy Turner v. Gene Dencker Buick-Pontiac, Inc.
and the Bank, but their claim against Gene Dencker was addressed in a separate trial and is not relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16274 - 2017-09-21
and the Bank, but their claim against Gene Dencker was addressed in a separate trial and is not relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment entered in Lori Pederson’s favor following a bench trial. Pederson, with whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment entered in Lori Pederson’s favor following a bench trial. Pederson, with whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that his trial counsel was ineffective. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955313 - 2025-05-13
that his trial counsel was ineffective. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955313 - 2025-05-13
Erin O'brien v. Badger Bowl, Inc.
Bowl violated the safe-place statute and was negligent at common law. The trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9380 - 2005-03-31
Bowl violated the safe-place statute and was negligent at common law. The trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9380 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because it was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84417 - 2014-09-15
because it was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84417 - 2014-09-15
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
of the violation following a trial in the Madison Municipal Court.[2] He filed a timely appeal to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
of the violation following a trial in the Madison Municipal Court.[2] He filed a timely appeal to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on October 7, 2011. ¶3 The matters proceeded to trial. We need not summarize the entirety of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148643 - 2017-09-21
on October 7, 2011. ¶3 The matters proceeded to trial. We need not summarize the entirety of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148643 - 2017-09-21