Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33511 - 33520 of 63250 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33511 - 33520 of 63250 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order dismissing John’s action and deny the motion to have the appeal declared frivolous. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63749 - 2014-09-15
the order dismissing John’s action and deny the motion to have the appeal declared frivolous. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63749 - 2014-09-15
Re/Max Realty 100 v. Howard Basso, Jr.
in denying its motion for a directed verdict at the close of its case-in-chief and argues that given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5732 - 2005-03-31
in denying its motion for a directed verdict at the close of its case-in-chief and argues that given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5732 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered a guilty plea to this charge after the circuit court denied his motion to suppress. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201773 - 2017-11-14
entered a guilty plea to this charge after the circuit court denied his motion to suppress. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201773 - 2017-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
matter, the circuit court granted the State’s motion to admit this other acts evidence. ¶4 Also prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101875 - 2017-09-21
matter, the circuit court granted the State’s motion to admit this other acts evidence. ¶4 Also prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101875 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rex B. Roberts
to deliver. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
to deliver. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
State v. John P. Ganzhorn
filed a postconviction motion for a new trial. After evidentiary hearings, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12549 - 2005-03-31
filed a postconviction motion for a new trial. After evidentiary hearings, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12549 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] In addition, he appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145219 - 2015-07-27
] In addition, he appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145219 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
, and on the State’s motion, the court dismissed the original possession with intent to deliver charge, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
, and on the State’s motion, the court dismissed the original possession with intent to deliver charge, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for life, and an order denying his postdisposition motion to stay the registration requirement. 2 D.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160761 - 2017-09-21
for life, and an order denying his postdisposition motion to stay the registration requirement. 2 D.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160761 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
its discretion in its pretrial motion rulings. The court denied Shong’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142995 - 2015-06-16
its discretion in its pretrial motion rulings. The court denied Shong’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142995 - 2015-06-16