Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33511 - 33520 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33511 - 33520 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was methamphetamine. The case proceeded to a jury trial, and, at the outset of the trial, the parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093591 - 2026-03-24
was methamphetamine. The case proceeded to a jury trial, and, at the outset of the trial, the parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093591 - 2026-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, I am sua sponte severing these cases; they’re going to be handled separately. There’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210536 - 2018-04-03
hearing, I am sua sponte severing these cases; they’re going to be handled separately. There’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210536 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the defendant in this criminal case, appeals a circuit court order appointing a special prosecutor. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06
, the defendant in this criminal case, appeals a circuit court order appointing a special prosecutor. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454294 - 2021-11-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454294 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
State v. Debra J. Findlay
, 520 U.S. 385 (1997), and Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995). Findlay interprets these cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2841 - 2005-03-31
, 520 U.S. 385 (1997), and Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995). Findlay interprets these cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2841 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
[PDF]
Jimmie A. Woodford v. Dorothy Bolter
” and that “Woodford afraid of being interrogated by me”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
” and that “Woodford afraid of being interrogated by me”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31